Why Housing Prices May NEVER Recover…
Here’s the thing…
I am always a little nervous sharing certain types of blog posts with you. And I am going to tell you why……
(Its not that I don’t think you can ‘handle it’. I know you can….)
1) Harris Real Estate University is the nation’s largest online real estate University. We have nearly 40,000 agents participating in HREU programs every day. We know that there are literally tens of thousands of you who rely on us to give you the real estate related info that you need. But, there is a risk on our part. Our industry doesn’t like bad news.
Have you noticed that its always a ‘Great Time To Buy A Home?’. (And you know what, depending on the buyers situation it may be a great time to buy. No debating that. )If we only reported the real estate news wearing the preverbial ‘Rose Colored Glasses’ we will be doing a massive disservice you all of you. Honestly, if we didn’t share the information (like this blog post) we would feel intellectually dishonest.
2) Some Realtors will read info like this and become paralyzed. They will be so full of fear because they don’t know what to do. These are the same agents who will be afraid of changing and evolving to meet the new market’s demands.
Its absolutely crucial that you get this next point…
Realtors are the only true hope for homeowners. No government program will ever replace the service that a caring, skilled and competent Realtor can provide. YOU speak directly with homeowners and buyers every day….you are their direct source for real estate information. Far too many agents are not taking this responsibility to heart. They are fearful of the changes that this market demands so their solution is to do nothing.
What you need to understand is that you do have what it takes to make the shift from the old real estate mindset into the new one.
Start with this powerful-prevailing thought: “What Am I Here To Give?” In other words, who can you help? If you were to ask yourself that question and honestly listen to the answer you would lose the fear and doubt and be one of the new breed of Realtors who actually…’Get it’.
What does this new housing market demand?…What do the Sellers and Buyers need for me to know?
What skills must I learn now to be of the highest service to my real estate clients?
What ‘Old Market Mindsets’ do I have that need to be changed? (For example; STOP selling based on greed. Greed based selling is wrong. For example: we went to an open house a few months ago and the last thing the agent said to us was ‘The next time you see this house it will be $1,000,000..(the current list price was $750,000). Well, guess what..the house went into foreclosure and the re-list price was $599,900. That agent only knew how to sell based on greed…get it?)
Here is the blog post…source: OfTwoMinds.com
Why Housing Is Not Coming Back (April 21, 2009)
The financial MSM and government officials alike are looking for a recovery in the housing market to bubble valuations to “restart the economy.” That is not going to happen–not this year, not in five years or even in ten years. Here’s why.
The entire world is hoping that housing is about to “recover” and re-ascend its glorious bubble-era heights of valuation. But it’s not going to happen.Why not? For several fundamental reasons:
1. Bubbles do not re-inflate in the asset class which just popped. It is simply a truism that bubbles never reflate, ever. Tulip bulb valuations did not rise to stratospheric heights after the Tulip Craze popped, and the Nasdaq dot-com bubble did not reinflate, either, for the very good reason that bubbles are never based on rational valuations–they are based on the psychological state of mania which cannot be reinstated once lost.
Consider tech stock Cisco Systems (CSCO), a well-managed “real company” which continues to make profits providing real-world goods and services. It currently trades at around $17.50 a share, down from its dot-com bubble valuation of about $81/share.
Realtors: Learn how to list REOs. Watch the FREE Agent REO Secret video now…and download the FREE REO Book. REO listings are THE listings to have in this market.
To “recover” its bubble-era valuation, Cisco would have to rise five-fold. That’s not going to happen. Now that the mania has dissipated, Cisco is valued on more rational metrics like earnings, profits, etc.The speculative mania always moves on to a new asset class. After the dot-com bubble popped, the speculative bubble moved on to housing. Now that the housing bubble has popped, the mania has moved to the bond market. When the bond bubble bursts (it’s guaranteed that it will in the next two years, losing 50% or more in the process) then the only asset class which hasn’t already been blown into a bubble is precious metals/gold.
In other words: those wishing to catch the next speculative mania should be buying gold and silver, not stocks, housing or bonds.
2. Inflation sets the “recovery” target ever higher. While we are in a deflationary period right now, a serious amount of inflation occurred between Cisco’s top in January 2000 and the present. According to the BLS Inflation Calculator, $81 in 2000 is $100 in current dollars.
So Cisco would have to rise not to $81 to match its bubble-era valuation but to $100. The same is true for housing. Consider the possibility many see on the horizon, a period of high inflation caused by the insanely stupendous rise in paper money supply.
I am not predicting such an inflation, just speculating on the effects it would have on bubble-era valuation calculations.
Let’s say a house which sold for $100,000 in 1997 was valued at $400,000 at the housing bubble peak in 2006. I fully expect the property to retrace to its pre-bubble valuation, as that is the usual progression of bubbles and their demise.
Now if inflation ramps up and ravages the value of the dollar, the price of a tangible good like a home might well rise more or less along with inflation, as people will be trying to turn their rapidly devaluing dollars into some tangible good as a means of preserving wealth.
But if inflation is clipping along at 10% a year and the house returns to its bubble-era value of $400,000, does the $400,000 retain the same purchasing power as $400,000 in 2006? No.
For an example of how this works, consider the stock market in the inflationary period of the 1970s:
While the stock market went from 1,000 in 1966 to 1,000 in 1982 14 years later, inflation destroyed 2/3 the value of the dollar. According to the BLS, $1 in 1966 was worth 34 cents in 1982, meaning those who held stocks for those 14 years did not retain their wealth as the Dow Jones remained at 1,000–they lost 2/3 of their wealth.
It is easy to foresee the same thing happening in housing should inflation ignite. Over the next 14 years, the house which sold for $400,000 in 2006 may well rise once again to that nominal price, but the inflation-adjusted value could well be closer to $100,000 when priced in 1997 dollars.
This is why nominal prices in stocks, housing, bonds and gold are essentially meaningless. All assets have to be valued in terms of purchasing power, and as imperfect and flawed as any inflation/deflation gauge might be, it’s still a better guide to purchasing power than nominal price.
3. Perhaps counter-intuitively, deflation also ravages bubble-era valuations. You might think that if inflation is tough on bubble-era valuations when priced in purchasing power (or some non-paper metric like gold), then deflation would be dandy. But deflation wipes out bubble-era valuations just as assiduously as inflation.
In deflation, debt grows ever more burdensome as money becomes more valuable and wages and income drop. As a result, assets dependent on debt ( that is, real estate) drop in value. In deflation, real estate become a “capital trap” which loses value as cash gains in value. As incomes plummet, so do rents, i.e. the income stream which real estate earns, further impairing its value.
Deflation often accompanies depression, and nothing is more of a capital trap than an empty house or building earning zero income. Compared to that, cash earning interest looks very attractive. This creates another drag on housing valuations.
So whatever the future holds, deflation or inflation (or periods of one following the other), housing will never return to its bubble-era valuations when measured by purchasing power/adjusted for inflation.
4. The fundamental driver of the housing bubble was once-in-a-lifetime low interest rates and loose/fraudulent lending.
Bond yields (and thus interest rates) tend to move in generational cycles of about 20 years– occasionally as short as 17 years and as long as 27 years. The current decline in yields has now run 27 years which the historical maximum for such cycles, and thus we can safely predict that yields and interest rates will be rising for the next generation.
Why would interest rates rise? Easy–the U.S. is borrowing trillions of dollars a year and once the rest of the world either runs out of cash or the desire to give us all their surplus capital then interest rates will rocket regardless of what the Fed or U.S. Treasury do. (Recall the analogy of the Financial Royalty standing knee-deep in a rising tide demanding the waters recede. Good luck with that, fellas.)
As for loose/fraudulent lending–you know the story already. It isn’t coming back.
So if the fundamental drivers of insanely low interest rates and insanely loose lending are not coming back, then precisely what forces will reinflate the housing bubble? The answer is: none.
Demographics? As noted here many times, housing density (number of people per structure) has been falling for decades. As density rises, all future population growth can be easily accomodated with the existing housing stock.
Speculative mania? That circus came to Housing Town and left, never to return in our lifetimes (if you’re three years old you may live to see another housing bubble in your dotage).
Those counting on a reinflation of housing to bubblicious heights to fuel another manic bout of borrow-and-spend will be sorely disappointed. Housing is never coming back if we define “coming back” as a return to bubble-top 2006 valuation as measured in purchasing power.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Similar Posts:
- The Future Of Housing | Realtors Redefining Role In Housing | Realtor Coaching | Real Estate Training Realtors, this detailed report on the possible...
- When Will Housing Recover…Are We Near Bottom Yet? /blockquote> Every morning when we look...
- When Will Home Values ‘Recover’?…Will Home Values Ever Recover? (Video) Worth watching Wall Street Journal interview...


















Interesting, but I think that this article is based on some flawed premises. Cheif among these is to suggest that residential real estate is comparable in any way to tulip bulbs, equties, or the dotcom bubble. Furthermore to suggest that investors flock from one dumb investment to another and create one bubble after another is more an observation of human nature than a meaningful comment on the intrinsic value of anything that has been or will be the subject of a bubble.
Residential real estate is differentiated from the bubble comparisons cited as well as most other “investments” by the utility of housing and the integral contribution to lifestyle, comfort, self-esteem, etc that housing makes. Housing is not some abstract bank balance, portfolio value, or future value of a retirement account. Housing is a 24/7, 365 integral part of the life of the occupant and/or their family. There has been an investment aspect to home ownership and this has been a real motivator for some but I would suggest that in most cases and to a great extent it has simply been a rationalization used to purchase more home than is needed.
Certainly the confluence of low interest and easy financing coupled with government social engineering, (which if it did not create dumb financing programs, certainly excerbated the problem and paved the way for financial instruments which could only exist and flourish with government guarantees and funding), led to the rapid and to some extent irrational rise in housing prices. While it is unlikely that we will witness this exact scenario any time soon, I do not believe that these factors are the only reasons for the rise in housing prices.
I think that it is clear that the global growth of the middle class and the concommitant rising demand for housing and the quality of housing is increasingly a factor in the cost of housing as the commodities utilized in the building of housing and infrastructure as well as consumer goods are in higher demand and ultimately cost more and will therefore drive up the cost of housing relative to the level it would be without this global impact.
I’m not sure that the notion of a generational cycle in interest rates is any longer applicable. Never in history has there been a system to facilitate global transfers of trillions of dollars daily as funds seek returns and security. Furthermore, at least in the short term national and international govermental agencies are at least attempting to control or influence rates and/or money supply.
The pressure on intrest rates caused by the crowding out effect of massive government borrowing will obviously be a factor. However it may not be as great as might be expected to the extent that government spending is substituted for what would have been private enterprise spending. Of course the gov spending will be less efficient and effective. Another mitigating factor is that as the cost of borrowing goes up in the free market, fewer dollars will be borrowed but funds will be allocated to higher productive uses and the velocity of money will be increased.
The notion of housing prices being impacted by lower demand created higher density households is in my opinion more theory than reality. When affordable there is a strong preference for separate housing, single family over multifamily, suburban over center city, and ownership over renting. In the US there is a strong cultural bias in favor of the current housing preferences that is not likely to change in the near term. Telecomuting, on-line shopping etc are making suburban living ever more practical and affordable.
The urban planners’ dream of stacking people up in central cities so that they may enjoy all of the benefits of infrastructure efficiencies, cultural opportunities, low transportation costs etc has proven to be an illusion.
However real estate “prices” are impacted by inflation, deflation, money supply, interest rates etc I remain convinced that the “intrinsic value” of residential real estate will compare very favorably with any other investment. Obviously any given property must be evaluated based upon demand. If there is an oversupply created by population shifts or simple overproduction there will be a devaluation relative to other assets. Obviously one can not blindly assume that it is a universal truth that all real estate values always go up. The proverbial brick outhouse in the middle of a desert has little value to anyone. However, all things being equal; well located, well designed, residential real estate will be hard to beat as an investment and unequaled in terms of utility and social and psychic income.