The Truth Behind The ‘Shadow Inventory’ | Real Estate Coaching
HREU Students and future students…this is a blog post from Exiledonline.com. As many of you know we read droves of different blogs and other news source every day. Its very interesting to me that some of the best information about what is really happening is NOT coming from the conventional sources. Read this article and let us know what you think.
US Stocks Gain On Report Of Pending Home Sales . . . Pending Home Sales Rise the Most in Over Seven Years . . . Consumer Confidence Spurs Broad Gain . . .
You see the same headlines churned out everywhere you turn. Yes sir, we’re supposed to believe the recession is over, recovery is underway and prosperity is just around the corner. We need to go out and fulfill our patriotic duty, which means buying things, preferably houses. That’s what smart investors would do, we’re told. And judging by the polls, Americans are starting to believe it.
Realtors, its not too late for you to become a REO Listing Agent. Learn how to become a REO listing agent. Start making money now from BPOs. Watch the FREE Agent REO Secrets video then download the FREE Agent REO Secrets book.
Contrary to just about every single economic metric — rising unemployment, rising credit card debt, falling production, spiraling real estate values — people are optimistic. The recession is yesterday’s news, everyone’s moved on. People are actually believing the hype and getting into real estate again. And anyway, how the hell can we talk about real estate when America is torturing people and still not closing Guantanemo!
Well, the real estate industry is fine with us not paying attention. Because it has a dirty little secret that shows just how (messed up) our economy really is, and how insolvent they really are.
In reality this McMansion is worth $30,000
If you, like me, live in a foreclosure-ridden area, it isn’t very hard to notice that the real estate optimism of you hear in the news just does not match reality. Take Victorville, my new adopted home. There are a total of about 30,000 single-family homes in Victorville. As of today, 4,590 of them are for listed sale in the general area (3,500 of them are foreclosures). The average listing price is $150,000, but most of them sell for half that.
There’s a 3 bedroom/3 bathroom McMansion just around the corner from my own that sold for $75,000 a month ago. The house cost $249,500 when it was built in 2004 and sold to some sucker for $338,500 at the peak of the boom in 2006. Three years later it was worth $125,000 — half of its original price — and now belonged to the bank, which was happy to cut the price by another 50% just to get rid of it. Houses sell so poorly, that real estate Web sites don’t bother listing “days the on market” metric.
The Rise and Fall of Victorville’s Real Estate
Pretty grim, right? Actually, it’s much worse. See, the weird thing about Victorville is that while 1 in 4 houses are vacant, and obviously have been for quite some time (just judging by the dilapidated state of the empty houses), very few of these empty houses are on the market for sale. Walking around my neighborhood, you rarely see a For Sale sign. There’s a foreclosure property up the street from me that has been prepped for long-term storage by its bank, with a notice posted on the living room window warning that the house’s pipes are filled with antifreeze so that they won’t burst when the temperature starts plummeting to zero in the wintertime, as it does here in the high desert.
Fact is, banks all across the nation are keeping foreclosed properties off the market. They’re doing it on purpose, to fudge the statistics and make it seem like everything’s alright.
The San Francisco Chronicle:
Lenders nationwide are sitting on hundreds of thousands of foreclosed homes that they have not resold or listed for sale, according to numerous data sources. And foreclosures, which banks unload at fire-sale prices, are a major factor driving home values down.
“We believe there are in the neighborhood of 600,000 properties nationwide that banks have repossessed but not put on the market,” said Rick Sharga, vice president of RealtyTrac, which compiles nationwide statistics on foreclosures. “California probably represents 80,000 of those homes. It could be disastrous if the banks suddenly flooded the market with those distressed properties. You’d have further depreciation and carnage.”
Realtors, its not too late for you to become a REO Listing Agent. Learn how to become a REO listing agent. Start making money now from BPOs. Watch the FREE Agent REO Secrets video then download the FREE Agent REO Secrets book.
In a recent study, RealtyTrac compared its database of bank-repossessed homes to MLS listings of for-sale homes in four states, including California. It found a significant disparity – only 30 percent of the foreclosures were listed for sale in the Multiple Listing Service. The remainder is known in the industry as “shadow inventory.”
The number of foreclosures is not going to decrease any time soon. Sean O’Toole, Founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar.com, told me that out of the 9 million mortgages in California, 2 to 3 million are upside down, which means their houses are worth less than what they owe on the bank. On top of that, anywhere from 700,000 to 900,000 households have stopped making payments and somewhere around 250,000 are scheduled to be foreclosed.
This adds up to a staggering number: a total of 3 to 5 million homes, one quarter of the 12 million households in California, are going to flood the market very soon. Nationwide, there is a two-year supply of unsold homes, twice what official statistics estimate.
To put it simply: banks are limiting supply in order to keep inflating the bubble. Keeping properties off the market makes sense for two reasons: it allows banks to engage in another round of brazen ripoffs by selling at least some of their properties at artificially high prices to a new wave of sucker investors (many of which are first-time home buyers). But more importantly, it allows the banks to avoid recording a loss on their balance sheets, making them look more profitable then they really are
It looks like the banks are all in on this racket together. Earlier this year, the industry had accounting rules changed to make this kind of market manipulation possible (meaning, profitable.) That’s what those new “mark-to-model” accounting rules back in April were all about. Instead of having the market determine prices, the changes allowed banks to value their assets based on a future projected worth to be determined by the banks themselves.
The change was pushed through with an aggressive lobbying campaign by the financial industry. For a measly $30 million in lobby fees, banks inflated their worth by tens of billions of dollars, instantly. Wells Fargo said the change boosted its capital by $4.4 billion in the fist quarter. In the second quarter, it is expected to increase banks’ earnings by an average of 7%.
It might be legal now, but it’s still fraud and flagrant market manipulation.
Here’s an account by the WSJ of how it went down:
The rules had required banks, securities firms and insurers to use market prices to help assign values to mortgage securities and other assets that don’t trade on exchanges — to “mark to market.” But when markets went haywire last fall, financial firms complained that the rules forced them to slash the value of many assets based on fire-sale prices. That contributed to big losses that depleted their capital and left several of the nation’s largest firms on the brink of failure.
Earlier this year, financial-services organizations put their lobbyists on the case. Thirty-one financial firms and trade groups formed a coalition and spent $27.6 million in the first quarter lobbying Washington about the rule and other issues, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of public filings. They also directed campaign contributions totaling $286,000 to legislators on a key committee, many of whom pushed for the rule change, the filings indicate.
Rep. Paul Kanjorski, a Pennsylvania Democrat who heads the House Financial Services subcommittee that pressed for the accounting change, received $18,500 from coalition members in the first quarter, the second-highest total among committee members, according to Federal Election Commission records. Over the past two years, Mr. Kanjorski received $704,000 in contributions from banking and insurance firms, the third-highest total among members of Congress, according to the FEC and the Center for Responsive Politics.
Realtors, its not too late for you to become a REO Listing Agent. Learn how to become a REO listing agent. Start making money now from BPOs. Watch the FREE Agent REO Secrets video then download the FREE Agent REO Secrets book.
The one obvious connection that is not being made is that this change in accounting, linked up with the shadow real estate inventory, is the shady base supporting our entire economy. Without the new rules, banks wouldn’t be able to pad their books in order to appear profitable. And without fudging the numbers, banks would never pass Geithner’s “stress test” or ever hope to to appear even slightly solvent.
It’s a twisted sort of logic, but it’s legal. It’s also very frightening. To think that all these empty homes I see around me are what’s keeping the US economy from total meltdown… If they had For Sale signs on them, the economy would tank even further. For now, these zombie homes don’t officially exist.
Ain’t the free market great?
SOURCE: http://exiledonline.com/
Popularity: 2% [?]
Similar Posts:
- Shadow Inventory, How Big Is It? | Banks Shadow Inventory Of Homes Means More REOs. How big is the banks Shadow Inventory?...
- When Will The Banks Release The Shadow Inventory? NOW…Are YOU Ready? What is the #1 question agents...
- How Many Bank ‘Shadow Inventory’ Homes Are There? | Real Estate REO Training Must watch new video from Bloomberg. Great...























Good Morning,
I really don’t think that we need to send out printed material with the “F” word in it.
Red Dalen
Carson City NV
Hi Red,
This was from another blog…and I did edit out some slang…I dont see the F Word….did I miss it?
While some of this article is logical, I believe that it is written with the wrong mindset. Calling first time homebuyers “suckers” to me is as bad as the “F” word.
Found it and re-edited it.
Thanks Red!
I am NOT saying that I agree with the content…100% but, his point have merit and need to be considered.
I tend to agree with this authors contentions. There does seem to be a need for this behavior but my concerns is whether this “need” may not have been created by the banks knowing they had the government wrapped around their fingers. Think about the fact that the bailouts have done nothing to stimulate the economy only sure up the banks books. We could go on and on about how the banks have manipulated the government to support them at the expense of the rest of the country. Take the Due on Sales Claus for instance. If that did not exist many houses could have avoided foreclosure. And what about the “programs” that the government comes up with. They all seem to have something about them that makes them totally useless.
They come in and get rid of down payment assistance at a time when people need it more than ever.
They create a tax credit that isn’t really a credit but a loan.
They change the tax credit but they still have to be 1st time home buyers to qualify and they get the money after the fact. Which does nothing to help someone aford the purchase of a home.
They come up with a bridge loan so people can use the money at closing but then say it can’t count towards the 3.5% down payment requirement. Oh great they can use it for closing costs. Big deal the seller can cover those for the buyer already!
Then they come up with HR 1728 which has homeowners being considered mortgage brokers if they offer seller financing more than one time in a 3 year period. OF course they hide it in a bill that looks like it is protecting people from predatory lending.
But think about it. When the interest rates go back up and people have less access to seller financing who is going to benefit?
We need to educate the general public to stop putting their money in the banks at 2% and start lending it directly to investors at 3 or 4 times that return and bypass the banks altogether.
I would be happy to pay 8% to someone on their IRA funds to buy a bank owned property at 50% of current market values. I could then resell with a wrap around or lease option the property. This would help get the properties off the books too.
Heck that brings up another thing the government has done to undermine the real estate markets. By not allowing “flips” they make it difficult for an investor to go in and buy an REO property for cash and turn around and sell it to an FHA buyer. Why? The banks wont sell them directly to an FHA buyer anyway! They want cash offers! The poloticians say they are trying to stop fraud but that is like outlawing cars because some people drive drunk! Are there people who are going to take advantage of the system? Always, but that is the case no matter how stupid you get with legislation. They are actually harming the system more whith their “fixes” than the few corrupt investors could ever do.
I am expecting next that they will allow the banks to start managing all these shadow properties as rental units. Heck we will be able to change the name of the country to Potter’sville. Where is the George Bailey that is going to keep it from happening?
well said…be sure to read the post I just put up about Wachovia….
I agree with the article, so, for how long will the banks keep their shadow inventory? Is it profitable to keep paying taxes and hoa fees? I have clients who can’t get a decent house with an fha loan because the investors are snapping the cheaper houses for cash.
Hi Carmen,
Read this:
http://timandjulieharris.com/2009/06/16/real-estate-coaching-training-shortsale/
Pay special attention to the notes I added….
Tim
I have clients that are still waiting for the values or prices to go down on the houses on the market, they are just sitting by waiting.
Evvy
Facts are good in preparing for the new market to come with the price reductions across the board on all levels of housing. Do you have any documentation from any bank that what you have in this blog is real???? I know you trying to prepare us for the upcoming market change but it would be great to have someone from the banking industry state their policy
JR
I am absolutely aware that they are renting the properties that they can’t sell.
There is a 70 unit new condo building in Santa Cruz, CA (that is huge for Santa Cruz, in fact it flooded the condo market) that is all going to be rented and they gave a couple of units to the city to rent to pay the back taxes and fees. Let’s see who the renters turn out to be… bankers?
Hey JR,
We do….read this post:
http://timandjulieharris.com/2009/06/16/real-estate-coaching-training-shortsale/
Tim
There’s a flaw in the premise of ALL upside down homeowners selling… I don’t know what the correct percentage is, but it’s not 100%.
I agree that we’re going to be busy with foreclosures & shorts for the foreseeable future, but I’m tired of the doom and gloom. Owning a home that is currently depreciating in value is not a problem as long as the payment is reasonable and you’ll eventually pay it off. People’s family homes aren’t underperforming portfolios.
I love what Heather said….lets here other perspectives….